People who are talking about the first NotV should at least explain what it consisted on so that everybody can understand.
I can only imagine two reasons why Dormio would be killed by scum: one is what SB stated and the other is him being spot on about his reads.
Conqueror is probably town, his thought process reads as genuine. In addition, D1 he kept posting more and more when he said he had to leave a couple of times, and I don't think scum would feel like keeping posting.
I think NNR is scum. He didn't hold any real suspicions on D1 and most of D2, and it feels like he posted for the sake of posting. I can't see a train of thought there, his comments on players seem random and non-commital. His D3 post on PX looks like casing someone for not being standard rather than for being scummy. I'm not sure of what to think about his CF7 votes, though.
@NNR: What made you change your opinion on Dormio? You first stated that he felt townie but then said you didn't feel good about him.
I'm ok with Raikaria's D1 and D2, but his D3 is being entirely different. His PX vote looks like switching just because NNR voted before, in spite of his CF7 suspicion being much stronger. How he's been handling the recruit spec seems super scummy as well, it looks like he's trying to get people to suspect general townreads more than doing actual scumhunting; I think that town would at least try to compare the post from D1/D2 to the posts on D3 that their suspects made. Probably the recruit.
I don't like how CF7 cases me for voteswitching and apparently not pursuing my case hard enough here but then he does the same. I don't think switching is scummy, but I think scum players are prone to case people for stuff they do themselves as scum.
##Vote: CF7Since he's still the scummiest. CF7 >>> Raikaria > NNR
RepliesThose contradictions aren't really contradictions
Why? Anyways I probably used the wrong word, they're more of inconsistencies than contradictions.
cf7 is troublesome~ I could get around that his mitsuki vote was reactionary but I remember his play style to be reactionary anyway~
Being reactionary isn't a scumtell by itself, but how one is reactionary varies according to one's alignment. As an example, PX's way of being reactionary seemed townie to me, but CF7's was the opposite
for the reasons I already stated.
I think CF7 would hold more conviction, if CF7 thought that he could convince someone.
Conviction is not about how much you think others will listen to you, but about how much you believe what you're saying.
I didn't switch to null, i stated the reason of your vote at the time.
I'm not talking about your read on me, I'm talking about you suspecting me based on my voteswitch.