Author Topic: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Happily Ever After  (Read 133393 times)

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #420 on: June 22, 2011, 12:02:57 AM »
Oh, and on the capt. h part, the "applies to himself" is in regards to PX.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #421 on: June 22, 2011, 12:09:53 AM »
Regarding the Conqueror/Kitten4u hybrid, again.
Your #397, are you calling it iioa, or are you saying that it looks like iioa?
I wrote a tidier version of it #402, is it still iioa?
I don't think I have anything else to add about Conqueror's actions so far.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #422 on: June 22, 2011, 12:12:25 AM »
And to clarify the mixing up I said I did in #415.
Whilst I was doing my reread my brain parsed UK putting down people as not answering questions for whatever reason.

PX

  • School Idol?
  • *
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #423 on: June 22, 2011, 12:13:47 AM »
...Dormio, I have no idea what you are asking of me.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #424 on: June 22, 2011, 12:15:22 AM »
Not really asking you anything.
Just saying that you're doing all the things that you accused capt. h of doing.
Which makes you all scummy-like.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #425 on: June 22, 2011, 12:25:17 AM »
Also, I think my current lynch priority goes something like:
UncertainKitten > PX > Kitten4u/Conqueror = Capt. h

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #426 on: June 22, 2011, 12:41:56 AM »
PX and Dormio-
I think the wagons are a bad idea and I would prefer a different lynch today. I still have a hard time buying into their scum intent and it just looks more like bad play to me.

UK-
She has been behind both of today's wagons, adding fuel and making sure they got a lot of speed. This makes me uneasy and if a town flip is had, I'd be looking at her with more scrutiny. If both end up town, then I will most likely make a case, barring a major change.

Schezo-
He has one case that he hasn't updated, and he's leaving himself open to jump on another wagon without actively pushing it. I no likey. Suddenly, cut by Schezo! I still don't like how his case is pretty passive and not pushing it as much as I would like. And now I have no idea what his priorities are. His next post will have to do a clear job at this.

Chaore-
Quote
@Hourai: Oh hey. You still exist. I love the town logic in 'they didn't vote immediately they MUST BE SCUM'. Lift that from Kiro? I held off voting because I wanted the two to post and explain what the fuck they were thinking so I could decide which I liked least. As it turns out they decided to wait a FULL DAY to get those posts out.
Please don't discredit me by putting words in my mouth and making up intents.

I don't understand how you couldn't have just voted who you  thought was scummier at the time, and then just move it if your opinion changed, like a townie. You took a  wait-and-see approach, which gives scum all the more power if you aren't scum yourself, between the two main wagons. And you've yet to even show  suspicion outside your two suspects, one of which is most likely getting lynched. So we have no idea what you'll do or target afterwards.

I feel my case on Chaore is stronger, he's gotten scummier to me, and I see more scum intent in his actions, so without further ado,

##Unvote
##Vote Chaore



OK, time for questions~

Where was LLD crumbing? #203
Quote from: LLD
Though, I realize I worded my statement poorly. I meant to aya that no where do you ever talk about my alignment.
Quote
I meant to aya
Quote
aya
This did not look like a normal typo to me, and considering the Touhou flavor in the game, it seemed much more likely to be a townie role than not.

Where was Chaore punishing bad play? In his first post, his case or suspicion on PX looked like it was focused on grilling him for his bad play, rather than saying why it was scummy or scum motivated. His recent posts take care of this point however, so I am not pressing this.

Quote
Hanged Hourai: I forgot he was playing. Just like in every other game. orz
:'[

Gonna get this follow-up post out there... for you, because you're special.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #427 on: June 22, 2011, 01:25:16 AM »
GOD OKAY I'M READING HUH WHAT AGAIN

Okay, I think I understand what bothered me earlier and I can actually pose this in questions huh what can answer.
I think it was pretty obvious why UK looked like the best of the three Bard voters at that point. PX was derping around and Dormio was attacking UK while keeping his vote on the largest wagon.
No, it wasn't. I remember saying that these obvious points were bad, but I see that I should have asked you to clarify this. More then one person stated a dislike of UK's actions at that point in time. Why was it obvious? PX was derping around (ie waiting for the action to resolve or not) and Dormio was attacking UK while keeping his vote on the largest wagon (ie continuing to state he thought Bard was scum if it wasn't a gambit but attacking his secondary scum target) but what was UK doing that was so townie at the time?

Your only contribution to the Lambda wagon was to say you didn't like PX's case on her, but I note you never made an opinion on HER at the time. The reason you said you didn't like his case is because it was weak and looked bad, but looking over your comments on both him and myself, you never really address why this is. It's easy to say 'this case looks weak' and 'that vote looked bad', but there's no reasoning behind it. It's bad because of what, general perception? In fact you never allude to what you thought of it before your weird post here where you're trying to.. I'm not sure what you were trying to do. I think you were trying to find a way to word a question to UK without attracting her ire, which on its own is understandable. but I think I consider it scummy because there's no follow up to her answer to you.

Speaking of meta-tells, I remember something else this entire situation reminded me of. Let's play reading the past, where Bardiche says the jokevote stage is over, then huh what slims down the suspect pool into our lynches by slamming people for attacking someone townie. I think this story ends with people calling for my lynch so I really hope that doesn't happen again. @_@ Seriously though huh what, I asked you why Bard ending RVS was townie because you were there when he did it as scum! It's almost the same words too! Saying his posts are townie because 'They seem logical' is just more good sounding words and doesn't even tell me what points of his you agree with!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've given up this UK suspicion, I'm pretty sure the rage is just rage at this point for feeling misrepped. UK does not like being a viable wagonz. This does mean I want Dormio and Zakeri to find another solid case, she's town, sorry.

And look, about Dormio. The only way what he's doing makes sense to me is if he's scum partners with UncertainKitten or possibly Kitten4Conqueror. Or both. Both would make more sense to me. If you don't believe in this (I don't right now) then you can't believe in scum Dormio. His reaction to the vig shot is alot like his reaction to the miller claim, and seizing on an early point and pressing it strikes me alot like his case against Comedian as Kyon. Instead of giving up he's continued to try and find more ways to impress his unpopular opinion on us. I don't think he's scum.

Considering I keep wondering why everyone hates PX's posts and calls them horrible while agreeing with his thoughts about huh what (and that I really needed to stop :effort:ing and reread him) I'm not sure how I feel about him either.  I'll go take a look at capt.h next and see if I think it's a good case. Basically his second post answered my concern about his focus, though I don't think it answered what he thinks about Dormio.

So yeah, I dislike All the wagons now, congrats me. These are the three names huh what dropped too, so it's awkward that they ended up receiving the most votes. I don't think it would make sense for huh what to be with either of them considering PX and Dormio are the names he dropped and focused on early, so I'm going to kickstart this again.

##Unvote
##Vote: huh what


I'm feeling much better now. Everyone seems suspicious to me again, except for UK. YOU'RE ALL SCUM. I think I've been cut 24 times so far, so I'll see if PX and Dormio have done something like claimed scum to make me regret this.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #428 on: June 22, 2011, 01:32:10 AM »
:effort:

How was me finding Bard looking townie for his posting quality problematic when UK and Lambda finding Hourai to be townie for similiar reasons was apparently completely fine?

I'll post something more serious eventually, but that immediately stuck out to me.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #429 on: June 22, 2011, 02:08:04 AM »
That's not what was problematic, and I fail to see how that's relevant. I asked you to justify the read and you really didn't. I dislike this 'Why me and not UK or Lambda' diversion. (See what I did there?)


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #430 on: June 22, 2011, 02:33:54 AM »
I predicted somebody would complain about that, so no you're not clever. <_< I honestly think that's a stupid tell (especially considering that it has been used to catch town both times it was used this game!), but eh.

I'm writing a post right now.

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #431 on: June 22, 2011, 02:44:42 AM »
Who is Bard referring to when he says "Haha"? He acts like it's a name, and I'm wondering if it's a filter or something. It's confusing me.

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #432 on: June 22, 2011, 02:45:13 AM »
Haha is me.

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #433 on: June 22, 2011, 03:03:04 AM »
Oh.

Fuck it. I'm trying to be coherent but I don't think I'm really in the right mindset to read people. I'm almost done with my post, though.

capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #434 on: June 22, 2011, 03:13:08 AM »
I've almost finished rereading everyone, and I just am having the hardest time finding players that still look like scum. PX is playing more town than I've seen for at least 3 games in that he's actually putting effort into his scum hunting and making cases. Dormio has taken a very clear and firm stance on UK and pushing it hard, which nullifies my previous vote of him. Hourai has pointed to exactly what his problem with Chaore is, and I can't say I really have a problem with Chaore other than maybe a gut suspicion. And Schezo is still suspicious with the way he says in his last post that Huh What needs a lynch, but he hesitates to call Huh What scummy - I don't think he has a strong read on Huh What. Most the post was about how players made him uneasy/read town, and there wasn't much of a push behind it.

Shadoweh, you're day 2 is really all over the place.

Since day 1, you've gone from Dormio being your top scum pick to protecting him with the following false dichotomy, while taking away one of the essential tenants of the dichotomy (scum UK):

I've given up this UK suspicion, I'm pretty sure the rage is just rage at this point for feeling misrepped. UK does not like being a viable wagonz. This does mean I want Dormio and Zakeri to find another solid case, she's town, sorry.

And look, about Dormio. The only way what he's doing makes sense to me is if he's scum partners with UncertainKitten or possibly Kitten4Conqueror. Or both. Both would make more sense to me. If you don't believe in this (I don't right now) then you can't believe in scum Dormio. His reaction to the vig shot is alot like his reaction to the miller claim, and seizing on an early point and pressing it strikes me alot like his case against Comedian as Kyon. Instead of giving up he's continued to try and find more ways to impress his unpopular opinion on us. I don't think he's scum.

You also start clearing PX and questioning the other cases on PX in spite of your previous vote on him. Don't assume I can keep up. Walk me through what exactly you found about them that made you reconsider your reads on PX and decide UK is town. I find it all a little suspicious.

I'm having a very hard time seeing scum Huh What. None of the points made against him stick out to me when I read him in isolation except his overreaction to your attacks.

Sorry, I'm having an off night. My current reads are that I'm somewhat opposed to a PX, Dormio, or a Huh What lynch after a great deal of thought. I'll make sure to pick a better scum pick before bed.

##Unvote

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #435 on: June 22, 2011, 03:31:52 AM »
##Unvote
##Vote PX
I've been fairly suspicious of PX for a while, as seen here, but the way he has recently been conducting himself just certifies him as terrible in my mind. I absolutely resent his claim that we should not look at the people on the Lambda wagon too closely, because looking at the only flipped townie wagon is one of the most effective ways to hunt scum at this point in the game. Given that PX was on the wagon himself, his attempt to drive us away from Lambda is just mind-blowingly infuriating to me.

But even aside from that, just about everything in PX's #355 irks me a lot, especially in hindsight now that he has placed his vote on capt.h. He claims to be torn between voting me and Dormio, and yet HE BARELY EVEN HAS A CASE ON EITHER OF US. What's worse is that he claims that I look like the better of the two when he JUST SAID that Dormio isn't even looking like scum to him. These were the people PX was considering voting, folks. Both of them looked like town to him. I don't even know how this could possibly be classified as derp, even if it's coming from PX. This is a blatantly obvious example of scum not knowing how to prioritize their cases or even make any. He's still basically borrowing from others in that post, too, as he's just considering the most common options rather than making his own case. But what bugs me even more is the way he later jumps on capt.h by completely dropping his comments on Dormio and me. It's like he was looking for wagons to jump on but just... gave up suddenly. I really can't explain why town or scum could do this, actually, but my personal hypothesis is that it was an indirect response to the amount of ire his post about me and Dormio gained - he did not address the complaints directly (argh why has PX not been defending himself at all this game), and is instead pretending they do not exist. Plus, jumping on a wagon unlikely to draw attention makes him less likely to be judged the following day - his initial jump on Lambda could possibly be seen as an attempt to do something like this as well, if he did not anticipate it taking off. I would personally summarize a majority of his recent actions as a textbook example of scum flailing.

On the other hand... I'm just going to be completely srs mode here and say that I really can not see Dormio as scum at this point. Maybe the Durrrmio vibes are finally setting in, I don't know. But I think the way he continues to press his UK case and conspiracy theories in the face of constant rebuttals and other posters telling him how weak the case is when the UK wagon barely even has a chance of taking off strongly shows that he is a genuine townie with a genuine opinion. Just, a terrible opinion that he is tunneling on. <_< I still maintain that his earlygame is awful, but... I don't feel comfortable attacking him anymore. Still, though, I want to know what he thinks of people who aren't UK. The tunneling is absolutely annoying even if I think it looks like townie tunneling because it means he's not really seeming to consider any other opinions to a notable extent. Zak has a similiar problem in my opinion (though his version of the UK case is less completely insane), and I want to know which of the current wagons he would most likely want to pass through as the day's lynch as well.



I'm finding that Chaore's content has been rubbing me the wrong way a lot. Not only was his initial stance on the Lambda wagon somewhat waffly, but it was basically set up so he would never have to commit to a true stance on her actions. Since she was unlikely to show up at the end of the day, he basically put himself in a situation where he could coast by having a "I find her actions bad, but not really scummy" opinion because she was never going to return to defend herself. Even the way he started off D2 makes him seem waffly regarding the Lambda wagon. So yeah, I'm very nervous about Chaore's nebulous stance on the Lambda wagon. If PX is indeed scum like I believe he is, I think I would most likely want Chaore lynched next, because even though Chaore has thrown out the possibility of PX scum, he has chosen to keep his vote on Dormio multiple despite acting as if PX is just as bad. Which isn't too awful in itself, but Chaore hasn't really come off as very commited to his PX stance in my opinion. The way he goes "I'm willing to see him die" after a few minor attacks makes it seem like he's trying to push PX and cheer on the people chasing that wagon, but not actually have to full-on consider the PX case a priority. I don't know if I'm making sense here.

capt.h still bugs me as well, his jump on Dormio seems notably weak to me because of the way he presented it. The way he wanted Dormio to give more recent stances makes me assume that capt.h was only pressing him, but capt.h still commited to his Dormio attack like it was a serious vote. It also seems odd that capt.h would consider UK suspicious, given that he considers Dormio to be "fairly likely to be scum". Dormio has been on UK for a majority of the game, and it has been discussed several times that hard bussing is not an effective strategy in this game, so the way capt.h went about his UK suspicion really makes me wonder if he was just throwing out suspicion on a townie he could potentially jump on later. I also felt that capt.h's Lambda jump from D1 was inconsistant due to the way capt.h's previous post came out, and I believe I already explained that in my earlier wallpost today. The fact that PX is voting capt.h right now doesn't really deter me because PX's capt.h vote looks like a last-ditch attempt at getting out a case and I could easily see scum!PX attempting to get out some last-minute Dormio-tier insane bussing, or at least when it's obvious that a capt.h lynch wouldn't even take off at this point. It's certainly not as unlikely as a hard bus, anyway, since PX hasn't really attacked capt.h up until this point as far as I know.

It should be noted that the way the two people who irk me the most aside from PX are voting Dormio is another factor in me choosing to lay off of Dormio for now.



Okay, really, I don't know why so many people are interpretting my earlygame question as trying to force a dichotomy. As far as I'm aware, building early cases on people is how we gain more opinions to consider and possibly even pick scum out of, which helps us evolve what stage of the game we are currently in. If everybody was just going to attack Bardiche alone, we would have had trouble analyzing opinions due to the lack of solid cases aside from "Bard may have possibly shot a townie!!", which would have given us a rockier start. It doesn't help that those cases would have been completely invalid after the truth behind Bard's shot was revealed. From my point of view, I was just trying to help the earlygame move along and potentially give everyone more content to work with. I didn't think it would have excluded the 7 players who didn't post, because at the time I was not under the impression they were avoiding the game due to its current stage, and I figured that their opinions when they arrived could have still been potentially telling and we could have updated our own stances/votes as they appeared. Because that's how the earlygame usually seems to play out with people who don't post until ~24 hours into the game. In short, I had pro-town intent and did not consider the possibility that I could be forcing a dichotomy, because I didn't even see the earlygame that way. And even if I was, I would have potentially been directing town to a dichotomy including myself, which wouldn't been a particularly effective tactic of scummy obfuscation at that point because I could have drawn unnecessary attention to myself. So ehhh.

Also, it's seeming to me that UK is only accusing me of scum because she wants to think I'm scum rather than that she actually does, which seems really odd to me because I've never actually seen a player act like they want to suspect another player before. I don't know. @_@ I get weird vibes from her attacks on me.



One more thing. I'm Chiyuri Kitashirakawa, Vanilla Townie and human. I'm not sure how to explain the flavor in my PM without essentially paraphrasing it and getting modkilled, but given that I am not really familiar with PC-98 Touhou at all, its relation to Chiyuri is completely lost on me anyway. Pre-emptive claim, maybe, but I haven't been the most active poster this game due to generally feeling lackadaisical (plus I'm simultaneously tired and irritated with the game in general right now so I'm probably not going to be too active for the rest of the day, if I go to bed early like I plan to then I'll try to set my alarm for before deadline though), and several people (PX, Kiro, UK) are currently in a position where they could probably slip onto my wagon and kill me in an end-of-day lynch rush if they wanted to, which means that I don't particularly consider myself safe despite only having two votes. Maybe I'm just paranoid. So there you have it.

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #436 on: June 22, 2011, 03:32:19 AM »
Ow. Fuck. That was pretty much a novel. I hope it actually makes sense. <_<

Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day One
« Reply #437 on: June 22, 2011, 03:40:01 AM »
THIS VOTECOUNT SPONSORED BY BEEPDOG

PX (4) - Kiro, Conqueror, UK, huh what
UncertainKitten (2) - Zakeri, Dormio
Dormio (1) - Chaore
huh what (2) - Schezo, Shadoweh
CaptH (1) - PX
Shadoweh (1) - Bardiche
Chaore (1) - Hourai

PX is at L-3!

Not voting: capt. h

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2011, 03:46:58 AM by Edible »

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #438 on: June 22, 2011, 04:01:26 AM »
@huh what: I said stuff already though. :(
#369 for stuff on PX and capt. h, and more about those two in #419.
I also dislike the Kitten4u/Conqueror, and am curious about his what his answer to my #421 will be.

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #439 on: June 22, 2011, 04:06:31 AM »
Dormio response:

1. What others? Everyone else put at least SOME reaction in. PX was yoohooing on RVS. I don't count K4U's reaction as "being here" since she was saying posting in confirmation was kind of dickish. I don't count Shadoweh's reactions (which were still more than PX gave) because, yanno, she thought she was dead.

2. OK? Anyway, it kind of doesn't help when all the cases on me ARE really bad, and once again, I've shown why in pretty much all cases except (arguably) Zak's.

3. 43 should have explained itself. PX is fairly obviously the ~*~anti-town player~*~, to the point I'd call him a VI. If I really had to explain that, I'm...really not sure if there's any possible way for me to explain anything to you.

4. Well, if that's what you want to think. You're at the point where you're tunneling so hard, nothing I say will get through to you.

5. Elaborate? What thing did I say I didn't do?

7. Uh, no? I mean, it can be used that way, but I'm fairly sure that's not a thing I initially accused her of.

8. It's clear enough if you think about it. I'm not sold on PX, I just think his lynch is both likely enough to provide a scum flip AND likely enough to provide information regardless so I'm willing to push it.

Again, it's been explained several times. I even explained it in that post. Bussing cred, right? So you kill your teammate and try to solo to D3. N2, someone gets recruited into the mafia. Guess what happens to EVERYONE'S CRED this game. Yeah, it goes the fuck away. So you were proposing I'd throw away a team mate for ~*~bussing cred~*~, likely my only other team mate (fun fact, I realized recently 2 scum wasn't confirmed, I was just assuming based on normal balance given the Mark of the Wold mechanic), to survive for two days without suspicion, in a game that gets a reboot D3. Things don't work like that, Dormio.

Hmm...so, this is totally going to be filed away as UK crushing suspicion because she's whiny and defensive again, but I'd like you all to consider this at least about Hourai's point on me. He's saying that if one of the lynches I support flips town, he'll look at me with more scrutiny. That's cool, I fully expect. Hell, when I realized that my 3 main suspects were all the wagons today, I expected to get a lot of flak for it. I'm kind of impressed I'm *not*. But...something feels kind of weird that it would take BOTH wagons flipping scum for him to make a case on me. First, it feels like he's planning to make sure both die, and knows they'll flip town. And secondly, that it would take two town flips for him to make a case on me. That gives me awful, awful vibes.

Um...actually, I don't want to comment on the Chaore case. I have thoughts and I'm not sure how I feel about them. Expect me to explain this in more detail day three. (I'll note we have less than 12 hours left in the day. We are not fucking up a majority lynch this time)

After all the transcribing I had to do, HW's post looks like :words words words:, though I did read his explanation of his early game dichotomy. I still don't like it. You're right, I want to think you're scum. Kiro, Shadoweh, K4U at some point? have been voting you. These are not people I ignore lightly. And I see a couple of their points. But I'm not feeling that you're completely scum outside of a gut read I have on you.

I am completely unclear on what Dormio thinks after his wall on me. Could you concisely state your opinions on not me, outside of town or scum? Like, elaborate things, ask what you want to ask, etc.

I want to see at least two votes on PX within the next hour, because we are not doing a 5 person lynch again.


Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #440 on: June 22, 2011, 04:14:33 AM »
Firstly, I should be around until the deadline or an hour before it and am willing to switch to PX at that time.

I should really not be posting in mafia right now but let's do this.
BRB writing.

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #441 on: June 22, 2011, 04:16:06 AM »
Theoretically I should be up an hour or two before deadline. Which one it actually will be is difficult to discern since apparently deadline moved to 11:00 AM EDT?


Kiro

  • Drinks: Everything
  • Sleeps: Anywhere
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #442 on: June 22, 2011, 04:22:37 AM »
Shadoweh: I think that's what I wondered about. Now I see it was requested of you by PX who when you acknowledged that he wanted you to look at it, you also voted him. You said he had no scum reads while incidentally acknowledging that he had one. Was it PX's post that made you change your read on Dormio? That is all kinds of confusing and I think capt.h has beaten me to asking you to lay out your thought processes on your vote changes today. And when you suddenly decide the Dormio case is no good, why bother looking specifically at HW? You said you were suspicious of K4U/Conquerer in #361 and your quick comment about him in #366 didn't indicate that your fears of him have been allayed. With your switch to HW in #427, I see you'll look at capt.h but I notice no mention of Conquerer's individual scumminess. I'll just put it simply, it looks like you're distancing from Conquerer. Has any of his posts since your #366 struck you as bad considering he only has Dormio and PX as his choices today?

Regarding Conquerer: he let Shadoweh go after she produced a case and vote. So it looked like he was easy to please regarding her, as if his vote was merely a prod. Not what we should be seeing in mid Day 2. The feeling of ignoring each other seems to be reciprocal as well. As for his updated reads, Conquerer definitely gives a waffly opinion on both Dormio and PX. Call it hydra syndrome, but you listed a bunch of things that made you think Dormio had Townie moves when you first replaced in #358. My question to you is based on the question you asked Dormio in #397 (which it looks like K4U provided for you), how does that one question possibly invalidate your previous Town impressions of Dormio?

To answer Shadoweh's question about where this puts me on PX, at the time you asked it, it would make me wary he is a mislynch now since your vote put PX in a tie with Dormio and Conquerer's happened to put PX in the lead after. But now since Bard has unvoted PX and you also unvoted PX recently, the idea that PX could be a buddy you were trying to bus is also there. Whether that would have been worth it before the Night 2 mechanic kicked in, I'm actually not sure. The HW wagon is actually feasible again and I need to rethink it again based on whatever he posts today. The wagons are really close now and I now see for sure I better make myself available for deadline in the morning.

Cut by HW: Ah new content post. Will consider it all, probably make a firm decision whether to keep my vote on PX or move it to possibly Shadoweh, Conquerer or HW before I go to bed tonight and check in in the morning before deadline for any last minute changes that might be deemed fit. I don't think my earlier tertiary picks Schezo or capt.h would be viable lynches today.

UK: Since you're around, how could everything fit based on what some of my stances. I'm getting swirly-eyed possibly framing my cases on scumpairs. Do you think PX redeemed himself in any way by making what looks like a reasonable case on capt.h? How does HW fit into scum PX since you're a bit wary of him? Do you have any comment about Shadoweh dropping PX for HW and Bard's switch from PX to Shadoweh?

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #443 on: June 22, 2011, 04:29:22 AM »
If I'm being perfectly honest? Everything I know is wrong, every wagon is terrible, but I'm only up for another hour at most so I need to push SOMETHING to an actual lynch, because a majority lynch is going to be valuable information. I can't really unvote and go for an off wagon, because that would be pretty bad. I'll be providing a list of updated reads D3 now that I've removed my own head from my ass, but it would be chaos causing if I did it right now. We do not need chaos, we need organization.

HW is a moderately agreeable wagon, and if it reaches a size where I'd be swing voting away from PX, I'd be willing to join it. That said, if PX is lynched, I'll look back at the PX wagon should he flip town like I'm becoming increasingly afraid of. I'm kind of getting that feeling I got when I was pushing LLD in the last hour of D1.


Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #444 on: June 22, 2011, 04:31:21 AM »
UK: As far as I'm aware, K4U hasn't voted me at all. In her last post, she said she felt I was town, so... yeah.

Also, judging a case's worth by the players who are presenting it is silly considering that you do not know what alignment those players have. <_<

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #445 on: June 22, 2011, 04:36:11 AM »
I have town reads on all of them. I trust my town reads. I wouldn't be doing this if it were tomorrow, due to, well, yanno, the mechanics of the game. Again, I've seen a couple things about you that bug me, and I do have my own gut read. Anyway, I might have been wrong about K4U, but there was a third ~*~good player~*~ I trust voting you, IIRC.

* UncertainKitten looks

OH! Right...uh, actually, LLD, who's opinion I can at least trust as sincere, even if her casemaking was lackluster. Given the backing of...well, my other town reads, and her flip, I'm comfortablish with your wagon. But I don't want to lose a majority lynch to ~*~11th hour wagon changing~*~.


capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #446 on: June 22, 2011, 04:47:16 AM »
If I'm being perfectly honest? Everything I know is wrong, every wagon is terrible, but I'm only up for another hour at most so I need to push SOMETHING to an actual lynch, because a majority lynch is going to be valuable information. I can't really unvote and go for an off wagon, because that would be pretty bad. I'll be providing a list of updated reads D3 now that I've removed my own head from my ass, but it would be chaos causing if I did it right now. We do not need chaos, we need organization.

HW is a moderately agreeable wagon, and if it reaches a size where I'd be swing voting away from PX, I'd be willing to join it. That said, if PX is lynched, I'll look back at the PX wagon should he flip town like I'm becoming increasingly afraid of. I'm kind of getting that feeling I got when I was pushing LLD in the last hour of D1.

I disagree. Actually, I find this scummy outright. You're admitting to pushing wagons you don't like to gain information that will lose some of its value with tomorrow's conversion, and you are stalling your reads until a time when you may no longer be town alligned.

Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #447 on: June 22, 2011, 04:49:16 AM »
But... if she's stalling her reads until a time where she may no longer be town, wouldn't that mean she's town right now?

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #448 on: June 22, 2011, 04:51:20 AM »
I think I'm too hot right now to be recruited. Further, by putting my new reads off til tomorrow, I'm committing to a course of action that will assist you to discern my possible intent. It's actually a somewhat pro town move, even if it hurts my win chances should I be recruited.

As for PX, I was convinced of PX scum. That's slowly been changing because I keep thinking about it and while there's a lot of derp, I keep missing the scum outside of a possibly counterwagon maneuver. However, I also notice we have about 10 hours left in the day. I know what happened LAST time we had 10 hours left in the day. So, I'm not going to let that be a thing.

HW cuts me with another good point :V.


capt. h

  • Only sane townie
Re: Night of the Vampire Mafia: Day Two
« Reply #449 on: June 22, 2011, 04:57:24 AM »
But... if she's stalling her reads until a time where she may no longer be town, wouldn't that mean she's town right now?

Depends.

From a town perspective, there should be the assumption that you could die on any given night, especially among the more townie players. In this case, UK should as town work under the assumption that she could be selected by scum. She shouldn't assume there will be a day 3 in which she is working towards the town win condition.

From a scum perspective, there is no threat of no tomorrow, so waiting to give out reads is not an issue or a concern. That's why I consider stalling reads until tomorrow somewhat of a scum tell, at least among players where getting NK'd (or in this case, converted) is an actual threat.