Cut;
Lexicat, I do appreciate what you said and it mollifies me somewhat. I will *get around* to a response to you, hopefully before night phase, however I feel it's not a priority right now because I need to make a decision about Moridin/Just today.
TL;DRThis was a humbling exercise whereby I ISO'd Dorian, found he was scummy up until the part where I went to bed, and then found that everything he did after that was plausible. So I'll write it off as a rough start and when I finally had time to read the big chunk of game that I'd missed...sigh.
Anyway I wrote all this stuff up so I'll post it here. I'm not going to follow the order I listed below, I'm going to do Bard/Moridin because tbh I should have done this first and not wasted time rehashing old territory but I was an arrogant prick and thought I was right so of course I was happy to redo it.
I'm moving Dorian from 'almost certainly scum' to 'possibly scum' along with Prims, Affinity, and Schezo, which is not reflected in the below list. There's no reason to read it except that I went to all that effort and maybe it'll be useful later.
***
It seems my previous scum tier listing was misleading so here we go.
Confirmed Town:
BT
Possibly Scum:
Affinity
Huwhat
Schezo
Probably Scum
Serela
Moridin84
ActionDan
Almost certainly scum
Lexicat
Just
Dorian
***
What's the objective of this: Get town talking, find motivation on players votes, watch for inconsistencies and liars. I'll do these in order of player signups as I have time to do it.
I'm full of righteous fury, let's go.
I'm just going to go down the player list in order, so first up is Dorian.
Wait a moment, was the Dan wagon a serious suggestion?
Prims and I both interrogated Dorian rather heavily about what Dorian was up to re: fencesitting on Dan.
Raikaria will later say 'fencesitting is not scummy' and we know how that went down.
Mhmm, I'm still against any kind of policy by default, even if this case is tempting, so I'll take my time see what the guy is doing before I reconsider the idea.
You say that you are 'still against', which means you said that you were against a policy lynch some time previously. I can't see it - can you point it out? Otherwise, why did you say this?
Defends a vote on Dan"a vote on Dan for being Dan is as useless as a vote for Schezo for having a muscle-shirt-catboy-abomination-avatar, cause the reason is not alignment implicative."
Dan is chronically afk and an excellent player to lynch or vig regardless of any situation because we have to deal with 'is he scum or not' at some point and scum will never kill him. You defended Dan three times and refused to hammer him later in the day. Why are you so protective of Dan?
You are also voting for Schezo at this point (it is RVS). Why did you criticise your own vote as useless? The implication is that you knew you were voting against a town player aka you are scum.
Well, it could be scum trying to establish a votepark wagon or town putting pressure on Dan for the reason you gave, I could see it go both ways right now.
Now my turn, if policy votes are so serious that you can discuss them, then am I scum for disagreeing with you or not?'it could be scum trying to establish a votepark wagon' - why do you say this?
'town putting pressure on Dan for the reason you gave' - which do you think is more likely?
'if policy votes are so serious that you can discuss them, then am I scum for disagreeing with you or not?'
Why would you be scum for simply disagreeing?
Or are you disagreeing because you are scum. Response to Prims re: wishy washyI'm sorry if I disappoint you but if you think that I can draw a clear conclusion out of your whimsical gambit right now, then you talk with the wrong one.^^;
- It's interesting that you said '...the wrong one' instead of '...the wrong person'. Is there somebody better you think Prims should have been talking to? Who? Why?
- It's clear that Prims was straight out asking you how you felt about a policy lynch and you supposedly are against it. Why were you unwilling to clearly underscore your desire to avoid a policy lynch, and instead just wilted away (and then vanished)? If you feel strongly enough to post three times about it I'm surprised you can't say it clearly at any point.
Phone post, on my way to work.
##Vote: BT
Tell me, what exactly is it that you find scummy about CF7? Cause I really don't see it.
Why did you single out BT's vote on CF7 and not any of the other votes? In particular, Raikaria's OMGUS against Schezo?
It's relevant because: Raikaria kept saying CF7 and Sky interactions were noteworthy for some reason, and Raikaria loved to defend-a-Dorian. The implication is that you voted for BT because he criticised your scum buddy, CF7. So I want to know what your reason for this vote was.
In
this post you say:
'@BT: The Dan wagon, as HuhWhat suggested it, was nothing more then prod vote thing and there is a point where just more votes/pressure wouldn't lead to more or better content, that's why I called it useless. But we all know Dan and how he loves to give us nothing, so I was wondering how to keep the pressure without tie my vote on him.
In English, a vote today wouldn't get us much but a vote tomorrow, that could go on forever.'
At the start of the phase, in response to Prims on ActionDan policy, you couldn't give a clear reason. Now you have a clearer reason. Why couldn't you say it from the start? It appears to me that you made up the reason after the fact.
In this same post:
"I can't help it but you agreed with HuhWhat a bit too eagerly for my liking and your Raikaria vote isn't impressive either. So what's your reason to exchange your prod vote on Dan for one one Raikaria?"
We know Raikaria flips scum. At this point you are voting alongside with Raikaria on Schezo and still defending Dan. Can you explain your mindset at this stage?
So, after I read Bards wall am I not sure why his actually a wagon. Good, he might be kinda stubborn there, a certain Luther quote comes to mind, but if that's scummy then I need someone who explains that to me (in preferably simple terms).
'Not sure why' means that you don't understand or don't agree with the case. Please explain what parts of Prims' case don't make sense to you.
However, despite all the Dan defending, when Dan townreads Schezo...
Dorian says:"Is that so? Is that really all you can say to prove me wrong? Throw me at least a bone if you want me to pick up the fight for you."
And things improve rapidly from here. I can't pick anything bad until day 2 - Dorian unvotes me and goes back to Schezo once I've changed my ire to Lexicat.
Siiiiiiiiiiiigh.