Raikaria, you are just plain wrong.
I want you to go back and read
your own post where you said BT was more likely to be scum than I, but voted for me because BT didn't want you to lynch him.
I think at this stage you are forced to vote for me because you know if BT dies and flips town, we will lynch you by POE.
Everything you have said on this page has been incorrect, misrepresenting and twisting reality to try to fit your square foot into a round shoe. You're not making any sense and you're arguing against your own logic.
Response to
Raikaria's #233.
I'm an idiot; of course Dan can't be SB's scumbuddy pulling a gambit; his initial role is un CC'ed and confirmed.
Yes, you are an idiot. I have been saying Dan is town cleared since the start of the day. You'll also note that you acknowledge that his role is uncounterclaimed, yet you'll later refuse to consider counter claims for why you should be voting BT.
Sky is panicking and making a case on me.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I made a case on you based on things that you have actually said and things that you have actually done, in ways that are not made up or misrepresentative, which
you have failed to do against me.
Frankly I saw so many things incorrect with the first few points alone that I gave up reading the rest of the walls but whatever:
Please reference the points you see instead of blanket statements like 'I saw so many things'. Town will reference. Scum will handwave, like earlier when you handwaved me by saying 'Sky's #176 gives suspect reasons for thinking Dorian is scum.' What are those suspect reasons?
You were challenged and failed to respond. You non-existent case is without merit and I am begging you to substantiate it in some way. I feel that you can't.
Completely ignore the fact that SB's vote on me came after I voted him for awful logic [Which not only I pointed out]. He then voted for basically for my reaction to his awful logic. That IS the definition of OMGUS
Voting somebody for bad logic is not OMGUS. The definitiion of OMGUS is when a player votes for another player because that player voted for the first player. You are wrong.
Apply what happened with two players that are neither SB or me to SB and me. This logic is therefor invalid.
What logic and what happened with who and where? It's impossible to understand what you are talking about. In any case, the post was just a gathering of points for relationships between SB and other players. There wasn't any case making contained within it.
If you actually read my D2 flip-flopping I say very frequently that I am alright with lynching either party.
I read it and saw you being happy to vote either party, and again today. That is why I said you are very aggressive this game. Is it not true?
In addition; I am happy to lynch today because it is certain that one of you or BT are scum. It's that simple. I'm happy to put you at L-1 because I know Dorian won't hammer; and I know Dan won't hammer; and I know you won't selfhammer.
Even if we do consider it as myself or BT (which it's not necessarily the case); you'll only vote me because you can't afford to let BT die or you'll be counterclaimed, yes?
If you know Dorian, Dan and myself won't hammer, isn't your vote on me futile?
You say my role is less trustworthy than BT's? I say the opposite.
Naturally.
Firstly BT's claimed role hasn't actually done anything at all yet.
Neither has yours, so this point is without merit.
He claims he was jailed N1 and he got nothing at all N2. Watcher and even Voyuer seems a little strong in this setup as well; especially with SB being a vanillaiser; if he targeted Dan on an Even night or whoever Dan was watching on an Odd night he would be screwed.
'Watcher and even Voyuer seems a little strong in this setup as well' - will you now reconsider the counterclaims on roled town?
And that's assuming he also didn't target whoever Valtz was blocking. There seems to be too many ways to screw over scum. Even if Valtz was still alive if I roleblocked that wouldn't be a checkmate situation. I could have roleblocked the guy Valtz blocked; or the guy Valtz jailed could have been the kill target and so on.
Indeed. Will you now reconsider the counterclaims on roled town?
Plus the fact that I actually have a role PM saying I'm a 1-shot roleblocker; makes me a lot more confident in the existance of my role than BT's.
It's your word versus his, so this point is meaningless.
Also don't kick up a stink about you posting more often than BT. Your posts had no content. BT's did.
I was referring
to you and I'm happy to go through and argue each point. I said that I had posted more than BT and more content than you, against your point that I am 'flying under the radar'. You made a lot of statements that are factually incorrect in reference to me so I am highlighting those points for dissection. You need to stick to the truth and reality.
And it's nice to see you actually doing something relevant at last when you are panicking about the noose. Typical scum reaction.
You're, again, ignoring day 2 and the fact I wasn't even in the game on day 1. Stick to reality and avoid the time-wasting sniping comments.
I'm eating dinner; more to come.
