Locking eyes with someone and generally waving off others as 'shades of red' is something I remember as particularly scummy, it gives their voteparks some depth and allows them to wait and see.
Every game I say everyone's red/Scum/green-coloured Scum. I don't see why it's more scummy of me this game than any other game?
Moridin should stop voting inactive people and vote people who he thinks are scummy; if you think the inactive people are scummy, quantify that they are and why they are more scummy than presently talking people.
I disagree with Affinity that "the only place my case can go is the past", in that the argument is incredibly weird. Everyone builds cases based on events that have already happened, and then use the responses to those cases to determine whether they still feel the same way. It feels like an eloquent way to say "Bard is voting over something that's already happened", which I happen to think is null. If I were voting for things that have yet to transpire, I'd start looking at myself oddly.
I don't like ActionDan, mostly because proddodging and refuging in audacity about it just isn't pro-Town play. The chief issue I have is that I can yell "it's scummy" all I like, but more than anything it's just not playing Mafia.
Huh What, I wrote my first post on my phone so I felt like being succinct. I'll take note not to do so again, but I'd like to point out that for all that your Town meta isn't static, you're usually not one to so pro-actively attempt to end RVS, let alone start (trying to) produce serious reads from the get-go.
I disagree with Town!Dan being pro-active. I think Dan is a shit player whatever alignment he has because he chronically refuses to play the game. I'll at least grant you that a Town!Dan would by now at least have made some reads, and all I see are prod dodges.
I agree re: BT's vote on me being weird chiefly because the reason for voting me is buried in all his other observations and reads, such that it seems an after-thought that he has reason to actually vote me. Feels more like a throw-away vote because he could than a genuine one, simply because his attention is so much more on other people and his only reason is "I agree with Huh What". Unlike BT, I don't remember every Mafia game. Remembering the last game is already unpleasant. "I don't buy his case" is, um, if everyone who's made a case I disagree with is scummy then I'm pretty sure we don't have enough lynches.
I dislike Raikaria's continuous harping that he's doing what he always does, as I happen to think Raikaria in the last game with his infuriating QT and ITP shenanigans was a lot more pro-active in questioning people and not sitting on his hands. If this behaviour keeps up Day 2, I would lynch it.
##Unvote
##Vote: ActionDanI happen to agree here though, I'd expected ActionDan to have made at least some sort of comment by now. You used to infuriate me with one-liners "this person is scum" etc, but now you're hardly doing anything. Which is reminiscent of last game.
